Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 08/30/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: April 17, 2017

According to the law firm press release, the lawsuit alleges defendants in connection with Alliance MMA’s initial public offering made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2016 could not be relied upon because of an error in recognizing as compensation transfers of common stock by an affiliate of Alliance MMA to individuals who were at the time of transfer, or subsequently became, officers, directors or consultants of Alliance MMA; (2) the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2016 could not be relied upon because of an error in recognizing as compensation transfers of common stock by an affiliate of Alliance MMA to individuals who were at the time of transfer, or subsequently became, officers, directors or consultants of Alliance MMA; and (3) as a result, defendants’ statements about Alliance MMA’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Personal Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: AMMA
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. New Jersey
DOCKET #: 17-CV-02583
JUDGE: Hon. Robert B. Kugler
DATE FILED: 04/17/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/06/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/17/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm (New Jersey)
    236 Tillou Road, The Rosen Law Firm (New Jersey), NJ 07079
    (973) 313-1887 (973) 833-0399 · lrosen@rosenlegal.com
No Document Title Filing Date