Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 08/14/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: March 01, 2017

According to the law firm press release, Netflix and certain of its officers and directors are charged with making a series of materially false and misleading statements and omissions related to the Company’s business and operations in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The allegations surround Netflix’s May 2014 price increase for monthly streaming subscriptions, and the Company’s failure to inform investors that – consistent with the Company’s prior experiences – the price increase could have a big, negative impact on subscriber growth. Instead, on July 21, 2014 the Company representatives told the market that the price increase had a “minimal” and “nominal” impact on subscriber growth, further stating that any adverse effect on revenue was “background noise” which had “no noticeable effect in the business.”

Less than three months later, on October 15, 2014, and contrary to its earlier statements dismissing the “minimal” adverse impact, the Company revealed that the impact on earnings was hugely negative. In fact, the subscriber growth numbers were so low that Netflix slashed its projected earnings by almost fifty percent. In an explanatory letter to shareholders dated October 15, 2014, the Company stated, “[Y]ear on year net additions in the US were down (1.3 million in Q3 2013 to 1 million in Q3 2014). As best we can tell, the primary cause is the slightly higher prices we now have compared to a year ago. Slightly higher prices result in slightly less growth, other things being equal, and this is manifested more clearly in higher adoption markets such as the US.”

As a result of the foregoing disclosure, Netflix stock plummeted by more than 19%, falling from a closing price of $448.59 per share on October 15, 2014 to a close of $361.70 per share on October 16, 2014.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Broadcasting & Cable TV
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: NFLX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 17-CV-01070
JUDGE: Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr
DATE FILED: 03/01/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/22/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/15/2014
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP
    501 West Broadway, Suit 1250, Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP, CA 92101
    877.493.5366 619.238.5425 ·
  2. Kahn Swick & Foti LLP (San Francisco)
    912 Cole Street # 251 , Kahn Swick & Foti LLP (San Francisco), CA 94117
    504-455-1400 5044551498 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 17-CV-01070
JUDGE: Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr
DATE FILED: 08/14/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/21/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/15/2014
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP
    501 West Broadway, Suit 1250, Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP, CA 92101
    877.493.5366 619.238.5425 ·
  2. Kahn Swick & Foti LLP (San Francisco)
    912 Cole Street # 251 , Kahn Swick & Foti LLP (San Francisco), CA 94117
    504-455-1400 5044551498 ·
No Document Title Filing Date