| Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Under Armour, Inc.

Case Summary

Under Armour, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 04/28/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: February 10, 2017

According to the law firm press release, the lawsuit alleges that, during the Class Period, Under Armour and certain of its officers made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that Under Armour's revenue and profit margins would not be able to withstand the heavy promotions, high inventory levels and ripple effects of numerous department store closures and the bankruptcy of one of its large retailers. Instead, Under Armour promoted itself as a growth company that would continue to develop and market game-changing products. Defendants' false statements and/or omissions caused Under Armour common stock to trade at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

The fraud was revealed on January 31, 2017 when Under Armour released weaker-than-expected earnings for the fourth quarter of 2016, and the poor results were in fact tied to market factors, such as department store closings.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Under Armour, Inc. website

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Apparel/Accessories
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: UA
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Brian Breece, et al. v. Under Armour, Inc., et al.

COURT: D. Maryland
DOCKET #: 17-CV-00388
JUDGE: Hon. Richard D. Bennett
DATE FILED: 02/10/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/21/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/30/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brower Piven (Stevenson)
    1925 Old Valley Road, Brower Piven (Stevenson), MD 21153
    (410) 332-0030 (410) 685-1300 · piven@abrowerpiven.com
  2. Gardy & Notis, LLP
    501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408, Gardy & Notis, LLP, NY 10017
    212-905-0509 212-905-0508 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities 02/10/2017
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 04/28/2017
 
 

Cases