Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/15/2020 (Other)

Filing Date: January 24, 2017

According to the law firm press release, the complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering failed to disclose material information, including that ReWalk was unprepared and/or unable to comply with “special controls” requirements or to provide the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with a postmarket surveillance study as required by the FDA for the Company to maintain ongoing sales of its products.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on March 23, 2017. A related case continues under Docket 17-CV-10169 in the District of Massachusetts.

A consolidated and amended complaint was filed on August 9. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on November 10. On January 23, 2018, the Court issued an Order denying the Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service of process. On August 23, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. The Dismissal Order dismissed the Securities Act claims. On May 16, 2019, the Court issued an Order dismissing the Exchange Act claims and closing the case. Lead Plaintiff filed a Notice appealing the Court's Dismissal Order on June 14. On August 25, 2020, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's Dismissal Order.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Medical Equipment & Supplies
Headquarters: Israel

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: RWLK
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 17-CV-00362
JUDGE: Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
DATE FILED: 01/24/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/12/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/24/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Reich Radcliffe & Hoover LLP
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 17-CV-10169
JUDGE: Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
DATE FILED: 08/09/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/12/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/29/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
  2. Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (Boston)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available