Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 10/31/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: November 16, 2016

According to the law firm press release, GoPro develops and sells mountable and wearable cameras and accessories in the United States and internationally. The Company’s cameras are designed primarily for filming while immersed in action, such as outdoor or extreme sports. On October 23, 2016, following months of delays, GoPro released the Karma drone, a compact, foldable drone designed for aerial photography using GoPro’s cameras.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) GoPro’s Karma drones were prone to losing power midflight, causing them to fall out of the sky; (ii) the Company had thus significantly overstated the utility of and likely customer demand for the Karma drone; (iii) the foregoing issue, when publicly known, would necessitate a costly recall of the Company’s Karma drones; and (iv) as a result, GoPro’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On November 3, 2016, shortly before the market closed, GoPro issued a press release and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the Company’s financial and operating results for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 (the “Q3 2016 8-K”). Among other information, the Q3 2016 8-K provided revenue guidance for 2016 in the range of $1.25 billion and $1.3 billion—a significant decrease from the revenue guidance of $1.35 billion and $1.5 billion that the Company had provided in reporting its financial and operating results for the previous quarter, and consistent with an anticipated recall of the Company’s Karma drone.

On this news, GoPro’s share price fell $0.90, or 7.01%, to close at $11.94 on November 3, 2016, and fell an additional $0.78, or 6.53%, to close at $11.16 on November 4, 2016.

On November 8, 2016, post-market, GoPro announced the recall of the approximately 2,500 Karma drones purchased by consumers since the product’s release, advising that the Company had discovered that Karma units were prone to losing power during operation.

On this news, GoPro’s share price fell $0.45, or 4.14%, to close at $10.41 on November 9, 2016.

On February 6, 2017, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on March 14.

The Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 13, 2017. The Court denied the Motion on July 26. Lead Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on August 4.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Photography
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GPRO
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 16-CV-06654
JUDGE: Hon. Claudia Wilken
DATE FILED: 11/16/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/19/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/04/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC (New York)
    60 East 42nd Street - Suite 4600, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC (New York), NY 10165
    212.697.6484 212.697.7296 · info@bgandg.com
  2. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
    600 Third Avenue, Pomerantz LLP (New York), NY 10016
    212.661.1100 212.661.8665 · info@pomerantzlaw.com/
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 16-CV-06654
JUDGE: Hon. Claudia Wilken
DATE FILED: 08/04/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/19/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/08/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
    685 3rd Avenue 26th Floor, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York), NY
    212..983.9330 212..983.9331 ·
No Document Title Filing Date