Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 11/10/2016 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: August 24, 2016

According to the law firm press release, the lawsuit alleges defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Airtronic USA, Inc.’s original equipment manufacturer supplier agreement that Global Digital disclosed in its press releases in October, 2013 did not exist; (2) Global Digital failed to remove these misleading statements from its website despite repeated requests to do so from the CEO of Airtronic; (3) Global Digital lacked a reasonable basis for its revenue projection for 2014; (4) Global Digital had no credible financing in place to acquire any company; (5) Global Digital received various communications indicating Remington Outdoor Company, Inc. had no interest in Global Digital’s unsolicited acquisition offer; (6) Remington had already rejected Global Digital’s offer on several occasions; and (7) as a result, defendants’ statements about Global Digital’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

On November 10, 2016, the Court appointed Lead Plaintiff and Counsel.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GDSI
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. New Jersey
DOCKET #: 16-CV-05153
JUDGE:
DATE FILED: 08/24/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/08/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/12/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm (New Jersey)
    236 Tillou Road, The Rosen Law Firm (New Jersey), NJ 07079
    (973) 313-1887 (973) 833-0399 · lrosen@rosenlegal.com
No Document Title Filing Date