Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 01/04/2019 (Other)

Filing Date: August 24, 2016

According to a law firm's press release, the Complaint alleges that Joy Global and the members of its board of directors violated Section 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15.U.S.C. §§ 78n(a), 78t(a), and SEC Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. 240.14a-9, in connection with the proposed merger between Joy Global and Komatsu America Corp. (“Komatsu”), the U.S.-based subsidiary of the Japanese multinational corporation Komatsu Ltd. (the “Proposed Merger”). The Complaint further alleges that the merger consideration and the process by which Defendants propose to consummate the proposed merger are fundamentally unfair to Plaintiff and the other common shareholders of Joy Global.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on October 7, 2016. A related case filed under Docket 16-CV-01229 continues.

On November 28, 2016, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on April 26, 2017.

On March 23, 2018, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement. On May 22, the Parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement. The Court issued an Order granting preliminary approval of the Settlement on September 14. On December 27, the Court granted final approval of the Settlement and entered Final Judgment.


Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Constr. & Agric. Machinery
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: JOY
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. Wisconsin
DOCKET #: 16-CV-01136
JUDGE: Hon. Nancy Joseph
DATE FILED: 08/24/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/24/2016
  1. Ademi & O'Reilly, LLP
  2. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
  3. Monteverde & Associates PC
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: E.D. Wisconsin
DOCKET #: 16-CV-01229
JUDGE: Hon. Nancy Joseph
DATE FILED: 04/26/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/13/2016
  1. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC (New York)
    60 East 42nd Street - Suite 4600, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC (New York), NY 10165
    212.697.6484 212.697.7296 ·
  2. Johnson & Weaver LLP
    99 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor, Johnson & Weaver LLP, NY 10016
    212.802.1486 212.602.1592 ·
  3. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
  4. Wagner Law Group, S.C.
    839 N. Jefferson St, Suite 400, Wagner Law Group, S.C., WI 53202
    414-278-7000 414-278-7590 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available