The Charles Schwab Corporation Securities Litigation
On or around 11/02/2016 (Ongoing date of last review)
Filing Date: July 13, 2016
According to the law firm press release, the Charles Schwab Corporation provides online brokerage services to retail investors, and the Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or omitted adverse facts about routing of its clients’ trades.
On November 2, 2016, the Court appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation
Industry: Investment Services
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: SCHW
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Robert Crago, et al. v. The Charles Schwab Corporation, et al.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 16-CV-03938
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
DATE FILED: 07/13/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/13/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/13/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Levi & Korsinsky (Los Angeles) 445 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor, Levi & Korsinsky (Los Angeles), CA 90071 (213) 985-7290 (202) 333-2121 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Order Granting Robert Wolfson And Frank Pino’s Motion For Appointment As Lead Plaintiff, And Denying Scott Posson’s Motion For Appointment As Lead Plaintff