| Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

United Online, Inc.

Case Summary

United Online, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 06/22/2016 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 10, 2016

According to the law firm press release, the action arises out of a May 4, 2016 press release announcing that United Online had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which B. Riley will acquire all of United Online’s common stock for $11 per share in cash, in a transaction valued at approximately $170 million (the “Proposed Acquisition”). The complaint seeks injunctive relief on behalf of the named plaintiff and all other similarly situated United Online shareholders (the “Class”).

The complaint alleges that, in an attempt to secure shareholder approval of the Proposed Acquisition, the defendants filed a materially false and misleading Proxy Statement with the SEC in violation of the Exchange Act. The omitted and/or misrepresented information is believed to be material to United Online shareholders’ ability to make an informed decision whether to approve the Proposed Acquisition.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on June 22, 2016.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: United Online, Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: UNTD
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Dennis Palkon, et al. v. United Online, Inc., et al.

COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 16-CV-04168
JUDGE: Hon. Beverly Reid O'Connell
DATE FILED: 06/10/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/04/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/10/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Robbins Arroyo LLP
    600 B Street, Suite 1900, Robbins Arroyo LLP, CA 92101
    619.525.3990 619.525.3991 ·
  2. Ryan & Maniskas, LLP
    995 Old Eagle School Rd., Ste. 311, Ryan & Maniskas, LLP, PA 19087
    (484) 588-5516 (484) 450-2582 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws and Breach of Fiduciary Duties 06/10/2016
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 06/22/2016
3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 06/22/2016

Reference Complaint

—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases