Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 01/31/2018 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 13, 2016

According to the Complaint, on May 8, 2016, Krispy Kreme and JAB jointly announced that they had reached a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement") whereby Krispy Kreme will merge with and into Merger Sub ("the "Merger"), with Krispy Kreme surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cotton Parent, Inc.

The Complaint alleges that the Merger Consideration and the process by which Defendants agreed to consummate the Proposed Transaction are fundamentally unfair to Krispy Kreme's public shareholders. In addition, it is alleged the Proxy contains materially incomplete and misleading information concerning (i) the background of the Proposed Transaction; (ii) the Company's internal financial data forecasts; and (iii) the financial analyses of the Proposed Transaction performed by Wells Fargo.

On September 21, 2016, the Court granted the parties' Consent Motion for Stay; all deadlines in the case are stayed pending further order of the Court.

On January 31, 2018, this case was voluntarily dismissed.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Restaurants
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: KKD
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: M.D. North Carolina
DOCKET #: 16-CV-00612
JUDGE: Hon. CATHERINE C. EAGLES
DATE FILED: 06/13/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/08/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/13/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
    685 3rd Avenue 26th Floor, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York), NY
    212..983.9330 212..983.9331 ·
  2. Ward Black Law
    208 W. Wendover Avenue, Ward Black Law, NC 27401
    336.333.2244 336.379.9415 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available