On or around 09/21/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)
Filing Date: June 13, 2016
According to the Complaint, on May 8, 2016, Krispy Kreme and JAB jointly announced that they had reached a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement") whereby Krispy Kreme will merge with and into Merger Sub ("the "Merger"), with Krispy Kreme surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cotton Parent, Inc.
The Complaint alleges that the Merger Consideration and the process by which Defendants agreed to consummate the Proposed Transaction are fundamentally unfair to Krispy Kreme's public shareholders. In addition, it is alleged the Proxy contains materially incomplete and misleading information concerning (i) the background of the Proposed Transaction; (ii) the Company's internal financial data forecasts; and (iii) the financial analyses of the Proposed Transaction performed by Wells Fargo.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc.
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: KKD
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
James Graham, et al. v. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc., et al.