Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 09/29/2017 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: June 03, 2016

According to the law firm press release, the lawsuit alleges throughout the Class Period defendants issued false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Banco Bradesco was engaged in a bribery scheme in collusion with the Brazilian Finance Ministry’s CARF; (2) Banco Bradesco executives were plotting to avoid an $828 million tax fine that was imposed by Brazil’s Internal Revenue Service; (3) Banco Bradesco’s CEO and other executives, directors and employees of the Company had engaged in bribery, money laundering, and corruption; (4) Banco Bradesco’s internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective; and (5) as a result, Banco Bradesco’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

On August 15, 2016, the Court appointed Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 21.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Money Center Banks
Headquarters: Brazil

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BBDO
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 16-CV-04155
JUDGE:
DATE FILED: 06/03/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/30/2012
CLASS PERIOD END: 05/31/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York)
    275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York), NY 10016
    (212) 686-1060 (212) 202-3827 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 16-CV-04155
JUDGE:
DATE FILED: 10/21/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/30/2012
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/27/2016
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP (Pennsylvania)
    280 King of Prussia Road, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP (Pennsylvania), PA 19087
    610.667.7706 610.667.7706 · info@ktmc.com
  2. Labaton Sucharow LLP
    140 Broadway, Labaton Sucharow LLP, NY 10005
    212.907.0700 212.818.0477 · info@labaton.com
No Document Title Filing Date