| Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Vale, S.A.

Case Summary

Vale, S.A. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 04/26/2018 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: December 07, 2015

According to the law firm press release, the lawsuit alleges throughout the Class Period Defendants issued false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the accident at Samarco of the bursting of the Fundao Dam resulted in the spillage of toxic waste; (2) Vale had a contract with Samarco that allowed Vale to deposit iron ore waste from its treatment plants from Vale’s Alegria mine into the Fundao Dam; (3) Vale’s programs and procedures to mitigate environmental, health and safety incidents were inadequate; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Vale’s business and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

On March 7, 2016, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiffs and approving Lead Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated Complaint on April 29. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the consolidated Complaint on July 25. On March 23, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Vale, S.A.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Basic Materials
Industry: Metal Mining
Headquarters: Brazil

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: VALE
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Ming Hom, et al. v. Vale, S.A., et al.

COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 15-CV-09539
JUDGE: Hon. Gregory H. Woods
DATE FILED: 12/07/2015
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/21/2015
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/30/2015
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York)
    275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, The Rosen Law Firm P.A. (New York), NY 10016
    (212) 686-1060 (212) 202-3827 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws 12/07/2015
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 12/09/2015
3 Memorandum Opinion and Order 03/07/2016

Reference Complaint

In re: Vale S.A. Securities Litigation

COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 15-CV-09539
JUDGE: Hon. Gregory H. Woods
DATE FILED: 04/29/2016
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/07/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/30/2015
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (San Diego)
    12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (San Diego), CA 92130
    858.793.0070 858.793.0323 · blbg@blbglaw.com
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint 04/29/2016
2 Memorandum Opinion and Order 03/23/2017
3 Order 05/26/2017
4 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 04/26/2018

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases