Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 12/08/2015 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: October 21, 2015

According to the law firm press release, Nobilis, together with its subsidiaries, acquires and manages ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and healthcare facilities in the United States. Its ASCs are licensed ambulatory surgery centers that provide scheduled surgical procedures in clinical specialties, including orthopedic surgery, podiatric surgery, ENT, pain management, gastro-intestinal, gynecology, and general surgery. As of March 18, 2015, the Company owned and managed 10 healthcare facilities in Texas and Arizona; a surgical hospital in Houston; six ambulatory surgery centers; two MRI centers; and an urgent care center.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company claimed success rates for its AccuraScope procedure which lacked recognition from any university, medical body, or insurance company; (ii) the Company had overstated its 2014 revenues by as much as $36 million; (iii) consequently, the Company had misrepresented its 2014 revenue growth rate as 161%, when it was actually only 44%; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, Nobilis’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on December 8, 2015.


Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare Facilities
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: HLTH
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Texas
DOCKET #: 15-CV-03098
JUDGE: Hon. Keith P Ellison
DATE FILED: 10/21/2015
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/08/2015
  1. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Friend
  2. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available