According to the law firm press release, Uranium Energy engages in the exploration, extraction, and processing of uranium concentrates on projects located in the United States and the Republic of Paraguay. As of July 31, 2014, it had mineral rights in uranium projects located in the states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming, as well as in the Republic of Paraguay.
The Complaint alleges throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Uranium Energy stock achieved an unsustainable valuation by using paid stock promoters, yet failed to disclose the use of such promoters in its regulatory filings pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933; and (2) as a result of the foregoing, Uranium Energy’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November 16, 2015.
On July 15, 2016, the Court issued an Order dismissing this case with prejudice. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of this Order on August 12. The Appeal was dismissed on September 26.