Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 12/21/2015 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: August 13, 2014

According to the law firm press release, Impax is a specialty pharmaceutical company engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of bio-equivalent pharmaceutical products, referred to as generic products, in addition to the development of proprietary branded products. The Company operates in two segments, referred to as the "Global Pharmaceuticals Division" ("Global Division") and the "Impax Pharmaceuticals Division" ("Impax Division").

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the quality control at the Company's Taiwan production facility. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company failed to maintain proper quality control and manufacturing practices at its Taiwan facility in violation of current Good Manufacturing Practices ("cGMP"); (2) the manufacturing deficiencies at the Taiwan facility could have a material adverse impact on the Company's ability to successfully launch its new drug, RYTARY; (3) the manufacturing deficiencies at the Taiwan facility jeopardized the Company's ability to manufacture, sell, and distribute generic pharmaceutical products; and (4) based upon the above, Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company and its outlook, including statements about its ability to launch RYTARY.

On July 29, 2014, Impax announced that the FDA completed an inspection of the Company's Taiwan facility. The FDA's inspection covered two areas. First, it covered a Pre-Approval Inspection for RYTARY, given the critical importance of the Taiwan facility to the manufacturing processes of the Company's drug candidate. Moreover, it included a general good manufacturing practices inspection. Based on its inspection, the FDA issued a Form 483 (a form used by the FDA to document and communicate deficiencies in a company's manufacturing quality-control system), stating that it had found "ten inspectional observations," or deficiencies, at the Taiwan facility.

On this news, the Company's shares fell $4.27, or over 15.23%, to close at $23.76 on July 29, 2014.

On November 19, 2014, the Court issued an Order appointing lead plaintiff and approving lead counsel. Lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint on December 10.

The parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement on May 27, 2015. This Settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on June 22. On December 21, the Court granted final approval of the Settlement and dismissed this case.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Major Drugs
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: IPXL
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 14-CV-03673
JUDGE: Hon. James Donato
DATE FILED: 08/13/2014
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/20/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/28/2014
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles)
    1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles), CA 90067
    310.201.915 310. 201-916 · info@glancylaw.com
  2. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
    600 Third Avenue, Pomerantz LLP (New York), NY 10016
    212.661.1100 212.661.8665 · info@pomerantzlaw.com/
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 14-CV-03673
JUDGE: Hon. James Donato
DATE FILED: 12/10/2014
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/06/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/01/2014
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Motley Rice LLC (Mount Pleasant)
    28 Bridgeside Boulevard, Motley Rice LLC (Mount Pleasant), SC 29464
    843.216.9000 843.216.9450 · inquiry@motleyrice.com
No Document Title Filing Date