Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 07/29/2014 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: September 25, 2013

According to the Complaint, it is alleged that Defendants intentionally and/or with deliberate recklessness engaged
in a manipulative course of business conduct in which they falsely represented to the investing public that all of their revenues were derived from the sale of aerospace devices, called momentum wheels, when in fact its revenues were largely derived from illegally exporting military semiconductors to Hong Kong.

Defendants failed to disclose to investors their unlawful exportation of semiconductors to Hong Kong or explain to investors that its cash holdings were the fruits of illegal activities that could be seized at any time. In addition,
Defendants failed to disclose to investors that its export activities were subject to United States arms control regulations that could seriously and negatively impact the price of Valley Forge’s common stock. Upon disclosure of the U.S. Attorney’s investigation and seizure of Valley Forge’s cash holdings, the company’s common stock price plummeted by more than fifty percent.

On January 10, 2014, the Court GRANTED Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel.

On April 28, 2014, the Court GRANTED Defendant’s motion and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint. The Court allowed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint which cures the defects within fourteen (14) days from the date of the order. On May 12, the Plaintiff filed the amended complaint.

On July 29, 2014, the Court issued an Order denying Defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The Court granted an individual defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Section 20(a). Plaintiff was given leave to file an amended complaint.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Aerospace & Defense
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: VLYF
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. California
DOCKET #: 13-CV-02307
JUDGE: Hon. Michael M. Anello
DATE FILED: 09/25/2013
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/01/2009
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/06/2013
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens, LLP (San Diego)
    1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1750, Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens, LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.232.0331 619.232.4019 · info@krausekalfayan.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. California
DOCKET #: 13-CV-02307
JUDGE: Hon. Michael M. Anello
DATE FILED: 05/12/2014
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/01/2009
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/06/2013
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens, LLP (San Diego)
    1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1750, Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens, LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.232.0331 619.232.4019 · info@krausekalfayan.com
No Document Title Filing Date