Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company Securities Litigation
On or around 05/30/2014 (Ongoing date of last review)
Filing Date: July 29, 2013
According to the Complaint, on May 20, 2013 Warner Chilcott and Actavis jointly announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Actavis would acquire all of the outstanding, publicly-held common shares of Warner Chilcott (“Merger Agreement”). On June 18, 2013, Actavis Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Actavis formed in May 2013 for purposes of facilitating the Proposed Transaction) filed a Form S-4 registration statement for New Actavis shares with the SEC (“Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement included a preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus on behalf of Warner Chilcott and Actavis to solicit shareholder votes in connection with the Proposed Transaction.
The Complaint alleges that in violation of Section 14 of the Exchange Act, the Registration Statement contains a number of material omissions concerning, among other things: (a) the background of the transaction; (b) key management projections; (c) the financial analysis of Warner Chilcott’s financial advisor, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., (d) the financial analyses of Actavis’s financial advisors, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Greenhill & Co., and (e) potential conflicts of interest of the respective financial advisors.
On May 29, 2014, a Notice of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement; Preliminary Certification of the Class for Purposes of Settlement; Approval of Notice to the Class; And Scheduling of a Final Approval Hearing wherein the Plaintiff respectfully requested the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 23 for an order: (i) preliminarily approving the proposed settlement (“Settlement”); (ii) preliminarily certifying the proposed settlement class for purposes of the Settlement (“Settlement Class”); (iii) approving the form and manner of giving notice of the Settlement to the Settlement Class; and (iv) scheduling a hearing for final approval of the Settlement and Plaintiff’s Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. The Motion shall be heard on a date to be determined by the Honorable Esther Salas.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Ticker Symbol: WCRX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Clifford G. Martin, et al. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, et al.
COURT: D. New Jersey
DOCKET #: 13-CV-04566
JUDGE: Hon. Esther Salas
DATE FILED: 07/29/2013
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/20/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/29/2013
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Brodsky & Smith, LLC Two Bala Plaza, Suite 602, Brodsky & Smith, LLC, PA 19004 610.667.6200 610.667.6200 ·