Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 04/13/2015 (Date of stipulation and/or agreement of settlement)

Filing Date: September 26, 2012

According to the law firm press release, the complaint charges Questcor and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Questcor is a biopharmaceutical company. The Company’s primary product is H.P. Acthar Gel (Repository Corticotropin Injection) (“Acthar”), an injectable drug that is approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the treatment of 19 conditions, including multiple scelorosis (“MS”), nephrotic syndrome and infantile spasms.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants violated the federal securities laws by disseminating false and misleading statements to the investing public about the effectiveness of Acthar as a treatment for MS and nephrotic syndrome, making it impossible for shareholders to gain a meaningful or realistic understanding of the drug’s prospects and market success. As a result of defendants’ false statements, Questcor’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $57.64 per share on July 9, 2012.

On September 19, 2012, Citron Research reported that Aetna Inc. (“Aetna”), one of the nation’s largest insurers, had recently revised its policy concerning Acthar, which would severely limit coverage of Questcor’s primary drug. Aetna had engaged in a review of the 19 indications for which the FDA had approved Acthar and determined that clinical research supported only one of the 19 indications. In Aetna’s clinical policy bulletin issued in connection with its review, Aetna reported that studies suggested that the drug is only “medically necessary” for West syndrome, a rare condition that causes infantile spasms, and not for other indications, such as MS, that are treated with steroids. On this news, Questcor’s stock plummeted $24.17 per share to close at $26.35 per share on September 19, 2012, a one-day decline of 48%. Then, on September 24, 2012, Questcor announced in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC that the U.S. government had initiated an investigation into the Company’s promotional practices. After this news, Questcor’s stock dropped $11.05 per share to close at $19.08 per share on September 24, 2012, a one-day decline of 37%.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) Questcor lacked clinical evidence to support the use of Acthar for indications other than infantile spasms; (b) Questcor had engaged in questionable tactics to promote the sale and use of Acthar in the treatment of MS and nephrotic syndrome; and (c) Questcor lacked a reasonable basis to make positive statements about the Company or its outlook, including statements about the effectiveness of and potential market growth for Acthar.

On January 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases, appointing lead plaintiff, and approving the selection of lead counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on March 5, 2013.

On October 1, 2013, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part defendants' motions to dismiss.

On November 12, 2014, the Court issued an Order granting plaintiffs' motion for class certification.

On April 8, 2015, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: QCOR
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 12-CV-01623
JUDGE: Hon. Dolly M. Gee
DATE FILED: 09/26/2012
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/26/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/21/2012
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Holzer Holzer & Fistel, LLC (Atlanta)
    200 Ashford Center North, Suite 300, Holzer Holzer & Fistel, LLC (Atlanta), GA 30338
    770.392.0090 770.392.0090 ·
  2. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 12-CV-01623
JUDGE: Hon. Dolly M. Gee
DATE FILED: 03/05/2013
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/04/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/21/2012
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Barrett Johnston, LLC
    217 Second Avenue, North, Barrett Johnston, LLC, TN 37201-1601
    615/244-2202 ·
  2. Holzer Holzer & Fistel, LLC (Atlanta)
    200 Ashford Center North, Suite 300, Holzer Holzer & Fistel, LLC (Atlanta), GA 30338
    770.392.0090 770.392.0090 ·
  3. Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates
    519 Alleghany Bldg., 429 Forbes Avenue, Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, PA 15219
    412.391.5164 ·
  4. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
No Document Title Filing Date