Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/27/2014 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: September 17, 2012

According to the law firm press release, BH REIT, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, is a real estate investment trust that owns 57 properties located in 21 states and the District of Columbia. The Complaint alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material information to the Proxy Class in a Schedule 14(a) filed on April 1, 2011 that sought to amend the Company’s charter to require any person making a tender offer to comply with the provision of Regulation 14D of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges that the Schedule 14(a) misrepresented Defendants’ motive for seeking to amend the Company’s charter. Additionally, the Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material information to the Tender Class in Schedule 14D-9(s) filed on September 7, 2011 and February 23, 2012 in response to Tender Offers the Company’s shareholders had received. The Complaint alleges that the 14D-9(s) misrepresented the value of the Company and information regarding past distributions that the Company had made to its shareholders.

On March 8, 2013, the Lead Plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of certain Officer Defendants without prejudice.

On March 27, 2014, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol:
Company Market: Privately Traded
Market Status: Privately Held

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. Texas
DOCKET #: 12-CV-03772
JUDGE: Hon. A. Joe Fish
DATE FILED: 09/17/2012
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/19/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/17/2012
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles)
    1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles), CA 90067
    310.201.915 310. 201-916 · info@glancylaw.com
  2. Kendall Law Group, LLP
    3232 McKinney, Ste 700, Kendall Law Group, LLP, TX 75204
    214.744.3000 214.744.3000 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. Texas
DOCKET #: 12-CV-03772
JUDGE: Hon. A. Joe Fish
DATE FILED: 02/01/2013
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/19/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/17/2012
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Block & Leviton LLP
    155 Federal Street, Suite 1303, Block & Leviton LLP, MA 02110
    (617) 398-5600 (617) 507-6020 ·
  2. Lackey Hershman LLP
    3102 Oak Lawn , Lackey Hershman LLP , TX 75219
    214 560-2201 ·
No Document Title Filing Date