Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/24/2012 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: June 29, 2012

According to a press release issued June 29, 2012, Centene operates as a multiline healthcare company in the United States. On June 11, 2012, the Company's stock price plunged over 22% after the Company cut its full-year profit and revenue forecasts due to higher-than-expected medical costs. Centene revised its projections to earnings of $1.45 to $1.65 per share for 2012 versus a previous forecast of $2.64 to $2.84 per share. In addition, the Company also disclosed that expenses were above projections for commercial polices sold by its Celtic Insurance unit and Centene was evaluating goodwill and intangible assets at the unit that may result in a non-cash charge of about $28 million.

The complaint alleges that Centene misrepresented its financial condition and failed to inform investors that the Company's 2012 outlook, provided at the start of the Class Period, lacked a reasonable basis when made due to already existing and understood competitive pressures.

According to the notice entered into the Court's docket on September 21, 2012, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice as to all claims an d Defendants.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare Facilities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CNC
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. Missouri
DOCKET #: 12-CV-01173
JUDGE: Hon. Catherine D. Perry
DATE FILED: 06/29/2012
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/07/2012
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/08/2012
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Carey, Danis & Lowe
    8235 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1100, Carey, Danis & Lowe, MO 63105
    (314) 725-7700 (314) 721-0905 ·
  2. Ryan & Maniskas, LLP
    995 Old Eagle School Rd., Ste. 311, Ryan & Maniskas, LLP, PA 19087
    (484) 588-5516 (484) 450-2582 ·
  3. Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
    2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 257, Saxena White PA (Boca Raton), FL 33431
    561.394.3399 561.394.3399 ·
No Document Title Filing Date