Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 11/06/2012 (Stipulation and order of dismissal (voluntary dismissal))

Filing Date: September 15, 2011

According to a press release dated September 15, 2011, the Company and its Board of Directors (the “Board”) with breaches of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty under Vermont state law, and with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”).

The complaint alleges that the Board, aided and abetted by the Company, in bad faith and for self-interested reasons, tilted the sales process for the Company in favor of one bidder and against a second bidder, and thereby obligated the Company to improperly pay the first bidder a termination fee of $19.5 million when the merger agreement was later terminated after the second bidder made a superior proposal that was accepted by the Board. The end result of the Company’s and the Board’s misconduct was to destroy shareholder value in the same amount of the termination fee, or approximately $1.57 per share. The complaint seeks damages for the Board’s breaches of fiduciary duty in this regard.

The complaint further alleges that on August 29, 2011, the Company filed a Form DEFM 14A Proxy Statement that omitted or misrepresented material information regarding the proposed acquisitions in violation of §§14(a) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act and in contravention of the Board’s fiduciary duties under state law. The Proxy fails to disclose, among other things, material information regarding: (i) the Company’s current and future value; (ii) details about the sales process, including details concerning the favored treatment of the first bidder, and the conflicts of interests faced by the persons involved; and (iii) the financial analysis conducted by the Company’s financial advisor. Without this material information, the Company’s public shareholders are precluded from casting a fully informed vote. The complaint seeks injunctive relief in connection with defendants’ violations of §§14(a) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act.

On March 19, 2012, the Court issued an Order granting in part the Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Counts V and VI were dismissed without prejudice. The parties were granted twenty days from the date of this Order to submit memoranda as to the propriety of the court's exercising supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law claims.

On April 6, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint.

On August 23, 2012, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice Counts V and VI of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.

On November 6, 2012, a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was entered into the Court's docket. This action was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.


Sector: Utilities
Industry: Electric Utilities
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: CV
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Vermont
DOCKET #: 11-CV-00222
JUDGE: Hon.Christina Reiss
DATE FILED: 09/15/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/15/2011
  1. Levi & Korsinsky LLP (DC)
    1101 30th Street, NW; Suite 115, Levi & Korsinsky LLP (DC), DC 20007
  2. Marino, Conroy & Coyle
    301 Warton St., Marino, Conroy & Coyle, PA 19147
    212-682-3025 215-682-3010 ·
  3. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
  4. Weiss & Lurie (New York, NY)
    The French Building, 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1600, Weiss & Lurie (New York, NY), NY 10126
    212.682.3025 212.682.3010 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available