Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 01/23/2012 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: July 07, 2011

According to the complaint filed July 7, 2011, the defendants violated securities laws in a proposed merger. The plaintiffs allege that the price offered was unfair at $7.75 per share compared to other valuations of the company as high as $8.00 per share. Further, the compliant charges that the defendants agreed to impermissible “deal-protection” devices. For example, the Board agreed to: (i) a “no-shop” provision that prevents the Company from negotiating with or providing confidential Company information to competing bidders except under extremely limited circumstances; (ii) a “matching rights” provision that allowed the bidder three business days to match any competing proposal in the unlikely event that one emerges; and (iii) a $8.35 million termination fee to be paid to the bidder if the board agrees to a competing proposal. These actions by the defendants, according to the plaintiffs, breached their fiduciary duties.

The complaint also alleges that the defendants caused to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a false and misleading Proxy Statement on Schedule 14, on June 30, 2011 for the required vote by the company’s shareholders. The plaintiffs assert that the Proxy Statement is false and misleading in that it misstates and/or fails to disclose material information concerning, inter alia, the sales process leading to the Proposed Transaction including specific details regarding why the Board chose to abandon negotiations with Bidder D, a third party bidder, and why Bidder D is accusing the target company of violating its exclusivity agreement and confidentiality agreement. Furthermore, the Proxy Statement omits certain material projections for the company, including free cash flows, as well as key inputs in the analyses performed by Jefferies & Company, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. The complaint alleges that these misleading statements and omissions constitute violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

On January 19, 2012, the plaintiff filed a Notice voluntarily dismissing this action without prejudice. This Notice was signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler 4 days later.


Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: Israel


Ticker Symbol: NSTC
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. New Jersey
DOCKET #: 11-CV-03950
JUDGE: Hon. Stanley R. Chesler
DATE FILED: 07/07/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/07/2011

  2. Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C.
    5 Becker Farm Road , Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C., NJ 07068
    (973) 994-1700 (973) 994-1744 ·
  3. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
    685 3rd Avenue 26th Floor, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York), NY
    212..983.9330 212..983.9331 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available