Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 10/31/2011 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 24, 2011

According to the Complaint filed June 24, 2011, the Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant company and its officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties and violated Sections 14(d)(4) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act in attempting to sell the Company.

The complaint alleges that the defendant’s failed to provide materially relevant information in the Recommendation Statement, thereby prohibiting shareholders from rendering an informed decision. The alleged omitted disclosures include: the criteria used by the defendants in selecting other possible merger partners; any indication on when the acquiring company would select executives for the post-merger company or that it anticipated hiring insiders of the target company; and reasoning for the depressed valuation of the proposed offer.

Moreover, the Plaintiff alleges that the offer price undervalued the Company compared to estimates from outside consultants and industry analysts. Further, the complaint states that the officers and directors would personally benefit, at the expense of shareholders, from the merger by joining the new company, thereby creating a conflict of interest and a breach of the defendant’s fiduciary duties.

On October 31, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a Notice voluntarily dismissing all claims in this action without prejudice as to all the Defendants.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Restaurants
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CPKI
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 11-CV-05311
JUDGE: Hon. Percy Anderson
DATE FILED: 06/24/2011
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/25/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/24/2011
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Levi & Korsinsky LLP (Culver City)
    600 Corporate Pointe, Suite 1170, Levi & Korsinsky LLP (Culver City), CA 90230-7600
    310-839-0442 310-558-3005 ·
  2. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
    30 Broad Street, 15 1h Floor, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, NY 10004
    212.363.7500 212.363-7171 ·
No Document Title Filing Date