Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 06/28/2011 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: June 07, 2011

According to the complaint filed June 7, 2011, the defendants violationed state law and § 14(a) and §20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder in connection with their attempts to sell Lawson to GGC, an affiliate of Golden Gate Capital and Infor, at an unfair price of $11.25 per share via an unfair process (the "Proposed Acquisition"). Further, as part of their efforts to seek shareholder approval of the Proposed Acquisition, the defendants have filed with the SEC a false and materially misleading Form 14A Definite Proxy Statement (the "Proxy").

In pursuing the unlawful plan to sell the Company via an unfair process and at an unfair price, each of the defendants violated applicable law by directly breaching and/or aiding the other defendants' breaches of their fiduciary duties of loyalty and due care, as well as federal securities laws. This action seeks to enjoin the Individual Defendants (as defined herein) from further breaching their fiduciary duties in their pursuit of a sale of the Company and from seeking shareholder approval of the Proposed Acquisition without disclosing all material information in the Proxy to Lawson shareholders in violation of § 14(a) and §20(a) of the Exchange Act.

On June 23, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice to re-file in the future. The case was terminated on the same day.

On June 28, 2011, the Court formally entered an order dismissing the case without prejudice based on the Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal.


Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: LWSN
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Minnesota
DOCKET #: 11-CV-01494
JUDGE: Hon. David S. Doty
DATE FILED: 06/07/2011
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/07/2011
  1. Anderson, Helgen, Davis & Nissen, PA
    150 South Fifth Street, Suite 3100, Anderson, Helgen, Davis & Nissen, PA, MN 55402
    (612) 435-6363 (612) 435-6379 ·
  2. Kendall Law Group, LLP
    3232 McKinney, Ste 700, Kendall Law Group, LLP, TX 75204
    214.744.3000 214.744.3000 ·
  3. Robbins Umeda & Fink, LLP (San Diego)
    1010 Second Avenue, Suite 2360, Robbins Umeda & Fink, LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    800-350-6003 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available