Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 06/15/2011 (Other)

Filing Date: December 29, 2010

According to the complaint filed December 29, 2010, the Proposed Transaction as currently constituted is unfair to Novell’s shareholders because it does not adequately value the Company’s future growth prospects, which will inure to Attachmate if the Proposed Transaction is consummated. Rather, the Individual Defendants were motivated to sell the Company in order to cash out their otherwise illiquid holdings in the Company through the accelerated vesting of stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock awards, as well as to take advantage of significant change-in-control and other personal financial benefits that are to accrue to them upon the sale of Novell to Attachmate.

On March 18, 2011, the action was consolidated with 10-CV-12076, and the consolidated case was re-captioned "In re Novell, Inc. Shareholder Litigation." According to the docket for the consolidated case, the Consolidated Complaint was filed on June 15, 2011. In the Consolidated Complaint, the Plaintiffs bring this action individually as to their claims under §§14(a) and 20(a), and as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 as to their state law breach of fiduciary duty claims on behalf of all holders of the Company's stock who were harmed by defendants'actions.

The case is now considered closed as to the federal securities class action claims, and ongoing as to the individual federal securities claims and derivative class action claims.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: NOVL
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 10-CV-12272
JUDGE: Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock
DATE FILED: 12/29/2010
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/21/2010
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/30/2010
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
    30 Broad Street, 15 1h Floor, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, NY 10004
    212.363.7500 212.363-7171 ·
  2. Matorin Law Office, LLC
    18 Grove Street, Suite 5, Matorin Law Office, LLC, MA 02482
    (781) 453-0100 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date