Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 03/03/2014 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: December 06, 2010

According to the press release dated, the complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws, Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, including allegations of issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market which had the effect of artificially inflating the market price. The class period is from July 31, 2009 through June 15, 2010.

On April 6, 2011, Judge John A. Houston granted the motion consolidate several actions under Master File in 10cv2502, approved the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System is appointed as Lead Plaintiff, and approved Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as Lead Counsel. On May 31, 2011, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint. The defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint.

On July 11, 2012, the Court issued an Order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiffs were granted leave to amend their complaint within 30 days of the order. On August 10, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint.

On March 22, 2013, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

On February 10, 2014, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare Facilities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GXDX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. California
DOCKET #: 10-CV-02502
JUDGE: Hon. John A. Houston
DATE FILED: 12/06/2010
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/31/2009
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/15/2010
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. California
DOCKET #: 10-CV-02502
JUDGE: Hon. John A. Houston
DATE FILED: 05/31/2011
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/31/2009
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/16/2010
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 ·
No Document Title Filing Date