Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 02/24/2011 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: November 08, 2010

According to the complaint filed on November 09, 2010, the Proposed Transaction provides Alberto-Culver shareholders with grossly inadequate consideration and is the result of a flawed sales process. After recently restructuring its business to focus on its consumer segment, the Company has reported two consecutive quarters of impressive sales and earnings per share, and Wall Street analysts have predicted rapid growth within the personal care products industry, the very focus of the Company’s business. Consequently, Alberto-Culver’s Board had substantial leverage to negotiate a significant premium in an all-cash sale of the Company. Nevertheless, the Board breached its fiduciary duties by electing to negotiate the sale of the Company, without ever contacting any other potential buyers.

According to a document filed on December 29, 2010, a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise and Settlement was filed with The Court of Chancery of The State of Delaware that effectively stayed this proceeding until a final judgment is approved in the state court proceeding. On February 24, 2011, the case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Personal & Household Products
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: ACV
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. Illinois
DOCKET #: 10-CV-07212
JUDGE: Hon. Virginia M. Kendall
DATE FILED: 11/08/2010
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/27/2010
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/08/2010
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Belongia, Shapiro & Hynes, LLP
    20 S. Clark St. , Belongia, Shapiro & Hynes, LLP, IL 60603
    312.662.1030 312.662.1030 ·
  2. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
    685 3rd Avenue 26th Floor, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York), NY
    212..983.9330 212..983.9331 ·
  3. Gardy & Notis, LLP (NJ)
    440 Sylvan Avenue, Gardy & Notis, LLP (NJ), NJ 07632
    201-567-7377 201-567-7337 · info@gardylaw.com
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date