Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/07/2011 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 09, 2010

According to the complaint, this is a class action (the "Action") on behalf of holders of the common stock of Axsys Technologies, Inc. ("Axsys" or the "Company"), who held shares as of July 30, 2009 (the "Record Date"), and their transferees, successors and assigns, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") (the "Class"): The Action charges Defendants with making false and misleading statements in a proxy statement that they filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and mailed to class members in connection with the sale of Axsys to General Dynamics Advanced Information System and General Dynamics Corporation (collectively "General Dynamics").

On August 16, 2010, a Proposed Order was issued by the Court appointing Joseph Chalverus and Harvey Baker as Lead Plaintiffs for the putative class pursuant to Section 21D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. and Harwood Feffer LLP are were appointed as Plaintiffs’ Co-lead Counsel.

On March 7, 2011, Plaintiffs dismissed the within civil action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).


Sector: Technology
Industry: Scientific & Technical Instr.
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: AXSYS
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Connecticut
DOCKET #: 10-CV-00901
JUDGE: Hon. Janet Bond Arterton
DATE FILED: 06/09/2010
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/02/2009
  1. Law Offices of Bruce G. Murphy
  2. The Brualdi Law Firm (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available