Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/29/2013 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: October 23, 2009

As alleged in the complaint, defendants published a series of materially false and misleading statements which defendants knew and/or recklessly disregarded were materially false and misleading at the time of such publication, and which omitted to reveal material information necessary to make defendants' statements, in light of such material omissions, not materially false and misleading.

On December 10, 2009, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. This motion was denied on February 18, 2010. On March 23 and April 1, 2010, motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction were filed. On May 24, 2010, the company filed a suggestion of bankruptcy and, as a result, the motions to dismiss were denied. On June 4, 2010, the motion for lack of jurisdiction was denied.

Individual defendants filed motions to quash and dismiss on August 17 and December 15, 2010. The motion filed on August 17 was denied on February 24, 2011. A motion for reconsideration was filed which was granted on September 30, 2011. That same day, the December 15 motion was denied.

On March 29, 2013, the Court issued an Order dismissing this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute his claims in this case.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Energy
Industry: Oil & Gas Operations
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CRMY
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 09-CV-23225
JUDGE: Hon. Donald L. Graham
DATE FILED: 10/23/2009
CLASS PERIOD START: 12/15/2007
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/31/2008
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Edward David & Associates, LLC
    3 Becker Farm Road, Edward David & Associates, LLC, NJ 07039
    973.994.3003 973.994.3003 ·
  2. Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
    2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 257, Saxena White PA (Boca Raton), FL 33431
    561.394.3399 561.394.3399 ·
No Document Title Filing Date