Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 02/14/2014 (Other)

Filing Date: September 17, 2008

According to a press release dated September 19, 2008, a class action was filed against the financial adviser, the underwriter, and the trustees of the Reserve Fund ("Reserve Fund" or the "Trust"). The action was brought on behalf of investors who owned shares in any class of the Primary Fund (or the "Fund"), a series of the Reserve Fund, who had not requested redemption of their shares by 3 p.m. E.S.T. on Tuesday, September 16, 2008.

The Reserve Fund is an investment trust organized under Massachusetts law, headquartered in New York City. The Trust consists of Mutual Funds, of which the Primary Fund is a series. The Primary Fund is a money market mutual fund that is required, by law, to invest in only the highest quality securities and debt obligations. The complaint alleges that in violation of its legal obligations, as imposed by the Investment Company Act and the SEC's Rule 2A-7 thereunder, the Primary Fund had invested in, and continued to invest in, approximately $785 million in commercial paper and other debt obligations issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. ("Lehman") (Pink Sheets:LEHMQ). As Lehman's financial difficulties mounted in recent months, its debt obligations became high-risk securities that were inappropriate for money market funds to hold.

The Complaint further alleges that by Friday, September 12, 2008, Lehman's financial situation had become desperate; yet defendants continued to hold the debt obligations. On September 15, 2008, when Lehman filed for bankruptcy, defendants were still holding onto $785 million of the Company's debt obligations, which were now worthless. By the afternoon of September 16, defendants had allowed about a dozen institutional investors to withdraw a total of over $40 billion from the fund, at the "net asset value" price of $1.00 per share. That is the per share value that the Reserve Fund, like virtually all money market funds, strives to maintain. However, the shares were actually worth less than that when they were redeemed. It was not until the markets closed on September 16 that defendants issued a press release announcing that the net asset value of the fund had belatedly been reduced to 97 cents per share, a shocking and extremely rare development known in the industry as "breaking the buck." The press release announced that investors who had sought redemption up to 3 P.M. that day would receive $1 per share, but that subsequent requests for redemption would be at the 97 cents price, and that payments for those shares would be withheld for up to 7 days.

As spelled out in the complaint, defendants violated Section 8 of the Investment Act of 1940 by deviating from the Fund's fundamental investment objectives without approval by the shareholders of the Fund and by allowing massive redemptions by a favored few investors at an inflated price of $1.00 per share. These actions gave an unfair advantage to certain fund investors at the expense of others, and in a manner which violated the Fund's stated procedure as well as defendants' fiduciary obligations to investors.

On February 11, 2009, this action and many others pending against The Reserve Fund has been coordinated or consolidated for pretrial proceedings under the Honorable Paul G. Gardephe in the Southern District of New York, 1:09-md-02011-PGG.

On August 26, 2009, Judge Paul G. Gardephe signed the Order consolidating the actions. According to the Order, for the foregoing reasons, Third Avenue Institutional International Value Fund, L.P.'s ("Third Avenue") motion for consolidation of the twelve above-captioned Reserve Primary Fund class action cases (08-cv-8060, 08-cv-8098, 08-cv-8103, 08-cv-8137, 08-cv-8139, 08-cv-8292, 08-cv-8593, 08-cv-8946, 08-cv-9525, 08-cv-9604, 08-cv-10006, 08-cv-10302) for pre-trial purposes is granted; these twelve actions shall be referred to collectively as In re: The Reserve Primary Fund Securities & Derivative Class Action Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 8060 (PGG) (the "Consolidated Reserve Primary Fund Class Action"). Further, Third Avenue's motion for appointment of Third Avenue as lead plaintiff in the Consolidated Reserve Primary Fund Class Action is granted, and Third Avenue's motion for appointment of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP as lead counsel in the Consolidated Reserve Primary Fund Class Action is granted. All other motions in the twelve above-captioned Reserve Primary Fund class action cases are denied.

On January 10, 2010, a Consolidated Class Action Complaint was filed, adding both defendants and securities laws violations. The defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss on September 3, 2010. The motion is currently pending before the Court.

On September 30, 2012, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's motion to dismiss.

On August 14, 2013, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement. The Settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on October 7. On January 13, 2014, the Court entered an Order awarding attorneys' fees and expenses. This was followed by an Order and Final Judgment granting final approval of the Settlement and closing this case.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Other (Mutual Fund)
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol:
Company Market: Open-end Fund
Market Status: Open-end Fund

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 08-CV-08060
JUDGE: Hon. Paul G. Gardephe
DATE FILED: 09/17/2008
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/16/2008
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/17/2008
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Wolf Popper, LLP
    845 Third Avenue, Wolf Popper, LLP, NY 10022-6689
    877.370.7703 212.486.2093 · IRRep@wolfpopper.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 08-CV-08060
JUDGE: Hon. Paul G. Gardephe
DATE FILED: 01/05/2010
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/28/2006
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/16/2008
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (New York, NY)
    1285 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (New York, NY), NY 10019
    212.554.1400 212.554.1444 · blbg@blbglaw.com
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date