Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 09/22/2009 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: October 03, 2007

The original class action lawsuit was filed against BigBand Networks, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, on behalf of shareholders who purchased the common stock of BigBand in connection with the Company's Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on or about March 15, 2007, or who purchased shares thereafter in the open market.

BigBand, certain of its officers and directors, and the Company's underwriters -- collectively, "defendants" -- are charged with including, or allowing the inclusion of, materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO, in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Complaint charges that BigBand raised over $159 million through the sale of 10.7 million shares, despite the Registration Statement's false and misleading statements issued in connection with the IPO. Specifically, the Complaint charges defendants with failing to adequately conduct a due diligence investigation into the Company prior to the IPO, and that they failed to reveal BigBand was not performing according to plan, lacked significant controls and procedures, and lacked any reasonable basis to forecast near-term foreseeable financial and operational results.

The Complaint further alleges that defendants failed to reveal the Company's results were already underperforming expectations at the time of the IPO, and that they had boosted the financial results of the quarter immediately prior to the offering by loading customers with unnecessary inventory -- such that sales in future quarters would foreseeably be adversely impacted as customers "worked off" excess inventory prior to purchasing more of BigBand's products. Additionally, the Complaint asserts that defendants failed to disclose that the roll out of its new products was not proceeding according to its growth plan, and that this transition too was adversely impacting revenues in the near-term.

On September 28, 2007, BigBand shares fell over 30% in a single trading day -- falling from over $9.00 per share to below $6.00 per share, before closing at $6.49 on exceptionally heavy trading volume of almost 7 million shares. This precipitous decline occurred after the truth was revealed to investors the previous evening that the problems existing at the time of the IPO, and detailed in the Complaint, would result in extremely disappointing results for the third quarter of 2007, including substantially reduced revenues.

On February 14, 2008, the Court entered the Orders granting the motion to consolidate the cases and granting the motion to appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. On May 30, 2008, a Consolidated Class Action Complaint was filed by the plaintiff, adding violations of §12(a)(2) of the Securities Act to the list of counts. On August 8, 2008, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint. On February 23, 2009, District Court Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong denied the two pending motions to dismiss, without prejudice to refilling.

On April 6, 2009, a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement was filed. The proposed settlement is in the amount of $11 million in cash. On June 1, 2009, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. A Settlement Fairness Hearing was set for September 15, 2009. On September 22, 2009, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong signed the order approving the settlement and approving the attorneys' fees and expenses.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BBND
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 07-CV-05101
JUDGE: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
DATE FILED: 10/03/2007
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/15/2007
CLASS PERIOD END: 09/28/2007
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 · info@csgrr.com/
  2. Finkelstein, Thompson & Loughran
    1050 30th Street, NW, Finkelstein, Thompson & Loughran, DC 20007
    202.337.8000 202.337.8090 · contact@ftllaw.com
  3. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (NY)
    12 East 41st Street, 12th Floor, Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (NY), NY 10016
    212.920.4310 212.696.3730 · info@kglg.com
  4. Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (San Francisco, CA)
    100 Pine Street, 26th Floor, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (San Francisco, CA), CA 94111
    415.772.4700 415.677.1233 · info@kaplanfox.com
  5. Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P.
    Suite 301, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue Southeast, Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P., DC 20003-4335
    202.544.9840 202.544.9850 ·
  6. Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
    2424 North Federal Highway, Suite 307, Saxena White PA (Boca Raton), FL 33431
    800.361.5096 888.782.3081 · info@saxenawhite.com
  7. Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP (Radnor)
    280 King of Prussia Road, Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP (Radnor), PA 19087
    610.667.7706 610.667.7056 · info@sbtklaw.com
  8. Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut)
    P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut), CT 06415
    860.537.5537 860.537.4432 · scottlaw@scott-scott.com
  9. Wolf Popper, LLP
    845 Third Avenue, Wolf Popper, LLP, NY 10022-6689
    877.370.7703 212.486.2093 · IRRep@wolfpopper.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 07-CV-05101
JUDGE: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
DATE FILED: 05/30/2008
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/15/2007
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/15/2007
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Berkeley)
    715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Berkeley), CA 94710
    510.725.3000 510.725.3000 · info@hbsslaw.com
  2. Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Seattle)
    1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Seattle), WA 98101
    206-623-7292 206-623-0594 · info@hagens-berman.com
  3. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (New Orleans)
    650 Poydras St. Suite 2150, Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (New Orleans), LA 70130
    504.455.1400 · lewis.kahn@kglg.com
  4. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (NY)
    12 East 41st Street, 12th Floor, Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (NY), NY 10016
    212.920.4310 212.696.3730 · info@kglg.com
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date