Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 11/05/2009 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: September 13, 2007

According to a press release dated September 13, 2007, the complaint charges LCA and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. LCA is engaged in the provision of fixed-site laser vision correction services at its LasikPlus vision centers.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and financial results, including EPS guidance of $2.05 to $2.15 for 2007. As a result of defendants’ false statements, LCA stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $50.56 per share in July 2007.

Then, on July 31, 2007, before the market opened, LCA issued a press release announcing its financial and operational results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007, and in a surprise announcement retracted the Company’s statements through the first seven months of the year that it would earn $2.05 to $2.15 for the year, lowering it EPS guidance for 2007 to $1.90 to $2.00. On this news, LCA’s stock collapsed to close at $35.51 per share, a decline of 17%, on volume of 3.5 million shares.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) the Company lacked requisite internal controls, and, as a result, the Company’s projections and reported results issued during the Class Period were based upon defective assumptions about the Company’s marketing budget and deferred revenue; and (b) the Company knew that its revenues were driven almost entirely by the number of procedures performed in its vision centers during the first quarter of the each year and that the Company’s existing stores (in operation for over 12 months) were not showing growth and any overall growth was being derived from new store openings. As a result, the Company’s projections issued during the Class Period about its forecasted 2007 EPS were at a minimum reckless.

On December 21, 2007, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to consolidate the related cases in the action.

On January 25, 2008, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to appoint Beaver County Retirement Board as Lead Plaintiff and Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP was appointed Lead Counsel and Strauss & Troy is appointed as Liaison Counsel for the Class.

On April 09, 2008, an Amended Complaint Consolidated Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws against the defendants was filed in this action by the plaintiffs.

On March 25, 2009, an Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motion To Strike And Granting Motion To Dismiss was entered into the court docket.

On November 05, 2009, an Order Denying Reconsideration was entered into the court docket.

On December 04, 2009, a Notice of Appeal was filed challenging the earlier motion to dismiss.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare Facilities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: LCAV
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 07-CV-00750
JUDGE: Hon. Susan J. Dlott
DATE FILED: 09/13/2007
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/12/2007
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/30/2007
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 · info@csgrr.com/
  2. Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates
    519 Alleghany Bldg., 429 Forbes Avenue, Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, PA 15219
    412.391.5164 ·
  3. Strauss & Troy
    The Federal Reserve Building, 150 East Fourth Street, Strauss & Troy, OH 45202-4018
    513.621.2120 513.241.8250 · wlwoods@strauss-troy.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 07-CV-00750
JUDGE: Hon. Susan J. Dlott
DATE FILED: 04/09/2008
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/24/2006
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/02/2007
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
    655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego), CA 92101
    619.231.1058 619.231.7423 · info@csgrr.com/
  2. Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates
    519 Alleghany Bldg., 429 Forbes Avenue, Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, PA 15219
    412.391.5164 ·
  3. Strauss & Troy
    The Federal Reserve Building, 150 East Fourth Street, Strauss & Troy, OH 45202-4018
    513.621.2120 513.241.8250 · wlwoods@strauss-troy.com
No Document Title Filing Date