Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/19/2008 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: June 18, 2007

The class action complaint was commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of all persons who owned seats on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange ("PHLX") on October 22, 2003 against Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc. ("KBW") and one of its managing directors. The Complaint charges defendants with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"). The complaint alleges that in connection with other wrongdoing surrounding the demutualization of the PHLX and to facilitate that wrongdoing, KBW published false and misleading statements that caused class members to lose their state law appraisal rights and acquiesce in demutualization, resulting in a loss to seat owners of at least $500,000 per seat.

On December 14, 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Class Action Complaint. On March 19, 2008, Judge Anita B. Brody granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and the case was dismissed with prejudice. According to the Memorandum and Order, this federal securities class action case is barred by the Delaware Chancery Court's Settlement Order in Ginsburg v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2202-CC (Del Chancery Ct., New Castle County). On April 15, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal as the Memorandum and Order. The appeal is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol:
Company Market: Undetermined
Market Status: Unknown

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania
DOCKET #: 07-CV-02464
JUDGE: Hon. Anita B. Brody
DATE FILED: 06/18/2007
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/22/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/18/2007
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Steven B. Mirow, Esquire
    249 South 12th Street , Steven B. Mirow, Esquire , PA 19107
    215.923.1311 215.923.1301 · sbmirow@verizon.net
No Document Title Filing Date