Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 08/01/2007 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: December 06, 2005

According to a press release dated August 6, 2007, EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp. (EVCI) announced that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has approved the settlement of the class action securities litigation pending against EVCI since December 2005. No stockholders objected to, or opted out of, the proposed settlement, which was filed with the Court on April 13, 2007. The Court's approval was entered on August 1, 2007 and makes the settlement final and binding on all class members. The settlement is being funded by EVCI's insurance carriers and includes the dismissal of all claims without any liability or wrongdoing attributed to EVCI or any other defendant.

In a press release dated May 21, 2007, the action has been certified as a class action for purposes of a proposed settlement valued at $7.725 million in cash. A hearing will be held before the Honorable Colleen McMahon, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 21-B, New York, New York, 10007-1312 at 9:30 a.m. on July 27, 2007 to determine whether the proposed Settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate and to consider the application of Lead Counsel for attorneys' fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses.

On December 15, 2006, the Court entered the Decision and Order denying the motion to dismiss. On April 13, 2007, a Stipulation of Settlement was filed.

On May 10, 2006, the Court entered the Decision and Order signed by U.S. District by Judge Colleen McMahon consolidating seven pending actions, and designating Arkansas Teachers as Lead Plaintiff and appointing its chosen counsel, Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman, L.L.P. On July 21, 2006, the plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, and on September 15, 2006, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.

The original complaint alleges that in an effort to further increase enrollment during the Class Period, EVCI had sought extension center status for its Yonkers site. The New York State Education Department ("NYSED") requires that an instructional location that offers more than 15 credit-bearing courses be approved as an extension center. The NYSED conducted a review of the Company's Yonkers site to determine if the location's facilities and resources were adequate to sustain the increased enrollment. In addition, the NYSED conducted a review of all of EVCI's facilities and resources as a result of the Company's extraordinary growth in enrollment since it first received NYSED non-probationary accreditation status in the year 2003.

Plaintiff alleges that during the Class Period, the defendants misrepresented EVCI's business conditions, financial results and prospects to public investors by touting the Company's strong revenue, earnings, and student enrollment growth while failing to disclose that EVCI's growth could not be sustained because it was enrolling more students than its resources and teaching staff could handle and that it would not receive extension center status from the NYSED. The true facts were revealed to the market on October 19, 2005, when EVCI issued a press release announcing that it received a draft review of a compliance review undertaken by the NYSED which included assertions of irregularities in its admissions practices and a proposed determination to deny extension center status for one of EVCI's college site, located in Yonkers, New York. The press release also revealed that the NYSED recommended that EVCI increase the number and percent of full-time faculty, improve its libraries, facilities and equipment resources, and improve the quality of student learning.

The complaint further alleges that EVCI' s announcement caused the Company's common stock to plummet 55.69% to $2.45, from its previous days closing price of $5.53. On December 6, 2005, EVCI announced that the NYSED's final determination was to deny extension center status for its's Yonkers location. In addition, the Company announced that the NYSED required EVCI to downsize its student enrollment at all of its college site locations in New York City. In immediate response to this news, EVCI's share price continued to downward spiral, falling to a low of $1.81 on December 6, 2005.

EVCI purports to provide on-campus career college education through various locations throughout New York and Pennsylvania. Almost all of the Company's revenue is derived from its New York City locations. Moreover, almost all of its revenue is derived from government sponsored financial aid programs established to help low income students pay for college.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Schools
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: EVCI
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 05-CV-10240
JUDGE: Hon. Colleen McMahon
DATE FILED: 12/06/2005
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/14/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/19/2005
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
    World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., MD 21202
    410.332.0030 · pivenlaw@erols.com
  2. Paskowitz & Associates
    60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, Paskowitz & Associates, NY 10165
    212.685.0969 212.685.2306 · classattorney@aol.com
  3. Roy Jacobs & Associates (New York)
    350 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000 , Roy Jacobs & Associates (New York), NY 10118
    · classattorney@pipeline.com
  4. Schatz & Nobel, P.C.
    330 Main Street, Schatz & Nobel, P.C., CT 06106
    800.797.5499 860.493.6290 · sn06106@AOL.com
  5. Smith & Smith LLP
    3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Smith & Smith LLP, PA 19020
    215.638.4847 215.638.4867 ·
  6. Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
    6 East 45th Street, Stull, Stull & Brody (New York), NY 10017
    310.209.2468 310.209.2087 · SSBNY@aol.com
  7. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New York)
    350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5508, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New York), NY 10118
    212.686.1060 212.202.3827 · lrosen@rosenlegal.com
  8. Wolf Popper, LLP
    845 Third Avenue, Wolf Popper, LLP, NY 10022-6689
    877.370.7703 212.486.2093 · IRRep@wolfpopper.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 05-CV-10240
JUDGE: Hon. Colleen McMahon
DATE FILED: 07/21/2006
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/14/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2005
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (Former New York)
    1285 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (Former New York), NY 10019
    212.554.1400 212.554.1444 · blbg@blbglaw.com
No Document Title Filing Date