Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/29/2006 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: December 05, 2005

On March 28, 2006, the plaintiff filed a Stipulation of Dismissal, voluntarily dismissing the case. On March 29, 2006, the Court entered the Order signed by U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, and the case was dismissed.

According to a press release dated December 5, 2005, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 by publicly issuing a series of false and misleading statements regarding the Company's financial condition, thus causing Ciphergen's shares to trade at artificially inflated levels.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that on November 16, 2005, Ciphergen disclosed, inter alia, that its Audit Committee had determined that the Company's previously reported results for the quarter-ended June 30, 2005 should no longer be relied upon and would need to be restated because revenue was recognized on certain transactions "in a manner inconsistent with the Company's revenue recognition policy." Indeed, the Company indicated that the restatement would reduce previously reported revenues for such quarter by $503,000 or 7% and result in an increase in the Company's previously reported net loss for such quarter by $301,000 or 3%. The Company also advised that the Audit Committee's investigation was not yet complete and that it was also "reviewing the appropriateness of revenue recognition in connection with certain transactions that took place in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and in fiscal 2005."

The complaint further alleges that on or around November 17, 2005, as a result of these disclosures, the complaint alleges that the price of Ciphergen common stock declined from a prior day close of $1.73 to close at $1.36 per share, a decline of approximately 21%, on unusually heavy volume.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Scientific & Technical Instr.
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CIPHE
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 05-CV-04997
JUDGE: Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel
DATE FILED: 12/05/2005
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/08/2005
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/16/2005
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (San Francisco, CA)
    100 Pine Street, 26th Floor, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (San Francisco, CA), CA 94111
    415.772.4700 415.677.1233 · info@kaplanfox.com
  2. Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
    World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., MD 21202
    410.332.0030 · pivenlaw@erols.com
No Document Title Filing Date