Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 02/23/2004 (Other)

Filing Date: January 28, 2003

This is a securities fraud class action on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased the common stock of Rhythms Net Connections, Inc. ("Rhythms" or the "Company") between April 7, 1999 through August 2, 2001, inclusive (the "class" and the "class period," respectively). Defendants defrauded the class by (i) issuing positive recommendations about Rhythms even though there were no rational economic reasons or factual bases to justify such recommendations; (ii) failing to disclose that they were issuing favorable recommendations to obtain investment banking business; and (iii) concealing significant, material conflicts of interest that prevented them from providing independent, objective analyses. Defendants advised the public to ignore rational concerns regarding an unproven company like Rhythms and instead used their influence and reputation to tout the Company's stock even though they knew or recklessly disregarded that there existed no reasonable basis for the positive recommendations.

During the class period, while defendants were issuing positive recommendations regarding the Company, Rhythms common stock traded as high as $111.50 per share. Only after the stock fell to approximately $1.00 per share did the defendants finally downgrade their recommendations.


According to the docket, on February 23, 2004, the Court entered the Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice as to certain plaintiffs and without prejudice as to others.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Money Center Banks
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: RTHM
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 03-CV-00528
JUDGE: Hon. Gerard E. Lynch
DATE FILED: 01/28/2003
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/07/1999
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/02/2001
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Beatie & Osborne LLP
    599 Lexington Avenue, 42nd Floor, Beatie & Osborne LLP, NY 10022
    212.888.9000 212.888.9664 ·
  2. Zimmerman, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
    39 Broadway, Suite 1440, Zimmerman, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, NY 10006
    212.363.7500 212.363.7171 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 03-CV-00528
JUDGE: Hon. Gerard E. Lynch
DATE FILED: 10/15/2003
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/07/1999
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/02/2001
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Beatie & Osborne LLP
    599 Lexington Avenue, 42nd Floor, Beatie & Osborne LLP, NY 10022
    212.888.9000 212.888.9664 ·
  2. Zimmerman, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
    39 Broadway, Suite 1440, Zimmerman, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, NY 10006
    212.363.7500 212.363.7171 ·
No Document Title Filing Date