Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 10/24/2005 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: June 24, 2005

According to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, beginning in late June 2005, four securities class action complaints were filed on behalf of Company shareholders in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, against the Company and several of its officers. The complaints allege that the defendants concealed adverse information about the Company’s defibrillators and sold stock in violation of federal securities laws. The complaints seek class certification, monetary damages, and injunctive relief. On October 24, 2005, these complaints were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

The Complaint charges Guidant and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company develops, manufacturers, and markets products that focus on the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, and coronary and peripheral disease, including implantable defibrillator systems. The implantable defibrillator systems are used to detect and treat abnormally fast heart rhythms that could result in sudden cardiac death.

On December 15, 2004, Guidant management entered into a $24.5 billion merger deal with Johnson & Johnson. While the Company pointed to its defibrillator business as a key component of that deal, the Complaint alleges, it concealed from investors significant un-addressed product defect and liability issues of the Company's implantable defibrillator product lines. Although life-threatening, defendants knew or consciously disregarded the fact that these mechanical problems were difficult to characterize and observe in implanted patients, making unlikely that any temporary physical disablement in patients would be attributed to device malfunction.

On June 17, 2005, the FDA issued a nationwide recall notification, impacting Guidant's implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Within that notification, FDA advised the public that the malfunction of Guidant's devices could lead to a serious, life-threatening event for a patient. On this news, the Company's shares fell $3.36, losing 4.5% percent of their value over the two trading days following the FDA recall, closing at $70.33, on a combined volume of over 25 million shares. As a result, Guidant investors lost over $1.09 billion in the value of their shares as a result of the surprise announcement of the FDA recall. Guidant's stock price closed today at $63.90 on tremendous volume exceeding 49 million shares on further news and Company warnings concerning problems with another of Guidant's implantable heart devices.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Guidant knew and concealed: (1) the serious health issues encountered by patients caused by the malfunctioning and defective nature of the defective devices; (2) the overwhelming threat to the deal Guidant had forged with Johnson & Johnson for the sale of the Company, including the threat to the ability of insiders to profit as a result of stock sales during the Class Period; (3) the lack and insufficiency of communications to healthcare providers and patients regarding the defective nature of the Company's defibrillator products, even when adequate communications were essential to protect the lives of its implant patients; and (4) the troubling decision to await overwhelming negative media accounts before taking affirmative actions regarding the Company's defibrillator products.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Medical Equipment & Supplies
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GDT
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Indiana
DOCKET #: 05-CV-00951
JUDGE: Hon. John Daniel Tinder
DATE FILED: 06/24/2005
CLASS PERIOD START: 12/15/2004
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/17/2005
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brodsky & Smith, LLC (former Pennysylvania)
    11 Bala Avenue, Suite 39, Brodsky & Smith, LLC (former Pennysylvania), PA 19004
    610.668.7987 610.660.0450 · esmith@Brodsky-Smith.com
  2. Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
    World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., MD 21202
    410.332.0030 · pivenlaw@erols.com
  3. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP (New York)
    One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor, Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP (New York), NY 10119
    212.594.5300 212.868.1229 · info@milbergweiss.com
  4. Schatz & Nobel, P.C.
    330 Main Street, Schatz & Nobel, P.C., CT 06106
    800.797.5499 860.493.6290 · sn06106@AOL.com
  5. Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
    3 Bala Plaza E, Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, PA 19004
    610.667.7706 610.667.7056 · info@sbclasslaw.com
  6. Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut)
    P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut), CT 06415
    860.537.5537 860.537.4432 · scottlaw@scott-scott.com
  7. Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
    6 East 45th Street, Stull, Stull & Brody (New York), NY 10017
    310.209.2468 310.209.2087 · SSBNY@aol.com
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date