Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 12/22/2004 (Other)

Filing Date: July 15, 2004

On October 21, 2004, the Court entered the Order granting the motion to appoint lead plaintiff and granting the motion for approval of lead plaintiff’s choice of co-lead counsel. On December 17, 2004, a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice was filed by all plaintiffs. On December 22, 2004, the Court entered the Order signed by U.S. District Judge David Hittner. The action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company's publicly filed reports and public statements contained false and misleading information, which resulted in damages to the plaintiff and members of the proposed class when they purchased the Company's securities. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company overstated revenue during the second and third quarters of 2003 by $2.07 million and $2.05 million, respectively, by utilizing an improper accounting method for calculating sales of electric power. The complaint alleges that the Company's conduct and the conduct of the other defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 10b-5 and that the individual defendants violated Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Utilities
Industry: Electric Utilities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GEXC
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Texas
DOCKET #: 04-CV-2869
JUDGE: Hon. David Hittner
DATE FILED: 07/15/2004
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/14/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/30/2004
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brian Felgoise
  2. Brodsky & Smith, LLC (former Pennysylvania)
  3. Hoeffner & Bilek, LLP
  4. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP (New York)
  5. Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP
  6. Vianale & Vianale LLP (former Boca Raton)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available