Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 10/07/2005 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: March 31, 2004

On May 17, 2005, the Court entered the Order preliminarily approving the settlement and providing for notice. A Settlement Conference set for August 25, 2005 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. At the Settlement Conference, Judge Sim Lake approved the settlement, the partial reimbursement of expenses, and the plan of allocation of settlement proceeds. On October 7, 2005, the Court entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.

According to a press release dated March 21, 2005, Verdisys, Inc. has entered into an agreement to settle the class action lawsuit filed in March 2004. Under the terms of the settlement Verdisys would issue to the class 1,150,000 shares of common stock and pay for certain out of pocket costs. The settlement is subject to court approval.

The complaint charges Verdisys and its former Chief Executive Officer and the Company's former Chief Financial Officer with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Complaint alleges that defendants made materially misstatements with respect to the Company's financial results. More specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose and indicate: (1) that the Company had materially overstated its net income and earnings per share; (2) that defendants prematurely recognized revenue from contracts between the Company, Edge Capital Group, Inc. and Energy 2000 in violation of GAAP and its own revenue recognition policy; (3) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls and was therefore unable to ascertain the true financial condition of the Company; and (4) that as result of recognizing revenue prematurely, the Company's financial results were inflated at all relevant times.

The complaint further alleges that on March 10, 2004, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading of the securities of Verdisys at 9:30 a.m. on March 10, 2004, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. on March 23, 2004. The SEC further stated that temporarily suspending trading in the securities of Verdisys was because of questions that had been raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information, including assertions made in Commission filings, concerning, among other things, the company's business operations related to its lateral drilling services and the company's anticipated and actual revenues. Then, on March 15, 2004, the Company announced that it was conducting an ongoing internal investigation that began in December 2003 into the Company's activities in the second and third quarters of 2003. The Company had thus far been unable to determine whether certain radial drilling services were actually provided to two of Verdisys' customers, Edge Capital Group, Inc. and Energy 2000 NGC, Inc. in the Monroe field in Louisiana. Accordingly, the Company expected to restate its interim 2003 financial statements to reverse $230,000 of revenue in the quarter ended June 30, 2003, and $605,000 of revenue in the quarter ended September 30, 2003, until such a time that it could confirm such services were performed. When shares of Verdisys resumed trading on March 24, 2004, they plummeted $2.10 per share, or 35.9%, on unusually high volume to close at $3.75 per share.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: VDYS
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Texas
DOCKET #: 04-CV-1297
JUDGE: Hon. Sim Lake
DATE FILED: 03/31/2004
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/20/2003
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/09/2004
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Cauley Geller Bowman Coates & Rudman LLP (Little Rock, AR)
    P.O. Box 25438, Cauley Geller Bowman Coates & Rudman LLP (Little Rock, AR), AR 72221-5438
    501.312.8500 501.312.8505 ·
  2. Federman & Sherwood (Oklahoma City)
    120 North Robinson, Suite 2720, Federman & Sherwood (Oklahoma City), OK 73102
    405-235-1560 · wfederman@aol.com
  3. Geller Rudman, PLLC.
    197 South Federal Highway, Suite 200, Geller Rudman, PLLC., FL 33432
    561.750.3000 888.262.3131 · info@geller-rudman.com
  4. Hoeffner & Bilek, LLP
    440 Louisiana - Suite 720, Hoeffner & Bilek, LLP, TX 77002
    713.227.7720 ·
  5. Schatz & Nobel, P.C.
    330 Main Street, Schatz & Nobel, P.C., CT 06106
    800.797.5499 860.493.6290 · sn06106@AOL.com
  6. Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
    3 Bala Plaza E, Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, PA 19004
    610.667.7706 610.667.7056 · info@sbclasslaw.com
  7. Weiss & Yourman (New York, NY)
    The French Building, 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1600, Weiss & Yourman (New York, NY), NY 10126
    212.682.3025 212.682.3010 · info@wyca.com
No Document Title Filing Date