Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 11/07/2005 (Other)

Filing Date: July 01, 2002

According to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2005, the Court had denied the Company’s motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint and had taken under advisement the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and the Company’s motion for summary judgment. On November 7, 2005, the plaintiffs filed, and the court approved, a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of all claims in this lawsuit. As part of this stipulation, the plaintiffs waived their right to appeal the dismissal.

The Company and certain of its officers were named as defendants in a purported class action lawsuit filed in July 2002 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, In re PerkinElmer, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 02-11314 GAO, on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between July 15, 2001 and April 11, 2002. The lawsuit claimed violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of, and Rule 10b-5 under, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, alleging various statements made during the putative class period by the Company and its management were misleading with respect to its future operating results.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Scientific & Technical Instr.
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: PKI
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 02-CV-11314
JUDGE: Hon. George A. O'Toole Jr.
DATE FILED: 07/01/2002
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/15/2001
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/11/2002
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York) (former)
    320 East 39th Street, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York) (former), NY 10016
    212.983.9330 212.983.9331 · Nfaruqi@faruqilaw.com
  2. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY)
    One Pennsylvania Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY), NY 10119-1065
    212.594.5300 ·
  3. Moulton & Gans LLP
    133 Federal Street, Moulton & Gans LLP, MA 2110
    617.369.7979 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 02-CV-11314
JUDGE: Hon. George A. O'Toole Jr.
DATE FILED: 01/13/2003
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/15/2001
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/11/2002
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross (Philadelphia) (former)
    1515 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross (Philadelphia) (former), PA 19102
    215-561-3600 215-561-3000 · bmgross@bernardmgross.com
  2. Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
    3 Bala Plaza E, Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, PA 19004
    610.667.7706 610.667.7056 · info@sbclasslaw.com
  3. Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (Boston)
    75 State Street, Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (Boston), MA 02109
    617.439.3939 617.439.0134 · info@shulaw.com
  4. Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York)
    270 Madison Avenue, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York), NY 10016
    212.545.4600 212.686.0114 · newyork@whafh.com
No Document Title Filing Date