Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 12/14/2004 (Other)

Filing Date: June 24, 2002

According to the Company’s FORM 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005, on or about May 27, 2003, the District Court granted, with prejudice, the
defendants' motions to dismiss the amended and consolidated class action
complaint. On June 24, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. In
November 2004, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
affirmed the decision of the District Court.

The original Complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company's financial results that had the effect of artificially inflating the price of Atchison common stock during the Class Period. Specifically, on March 20, 2002, Corrpro announced that it had discovered accounting irregularities causing the Company's consolidated operating income before taxes through December 31, 2001 to be inflated by between $4.5 and $5.3 million. In addition, the Company announced that as a result of these "irregularities," it is expected to have to take a charge to pre-tax earnings in the Company's fiscal fourth quarter ending March 31, 2002 of between $5.3 and $6.7 million. The irregularities are alleged to have occurred at the Company's Australian subsidiary and appear to date back to at least calendar year 2000. Corrpro "expects" that it will have to restate its audited financial statements for the March 31, 2001 fiscal year as well as unaudited financial results for the first nine months through December 31, 2001 of its fiscal year ending March 31, 2002. The Company also admitted that, due to the irregularities and likely restatement, Corrpro will be in default under the financial covenants of its senior secured credit agreement and its senior note facility. Upon default, Corrpro's lenders may accelerate repayment of principal which could have a material adverse impact on the Company's liquidity, its financial position and/or its ability to operate as a going concern. The Company also announced that it had replaced its CFO, the fourth CFO the Company had employed in the past three years.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Construction Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CO
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 02-CV-01198
JUDGE: Hon. Paul R. Matia
DATE FILED: 06/24/2002
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/01/2000
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/20/2002
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
    World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., MD 21202
    410.332.0030 · pivenlaw@erols.com
  2. Leo W. Desmond
    2161 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 204, Leo W. Desmond, FL 33409
    561.712.8000 561.712.8000 · stocklaw@bellsouth.net
  3. Schubert & Reed LLP
    Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1050, Schubert & Reed LLP, CA 94111
    415.788.4220 415.788.0161 · mail@schubert-reed.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 02-CV-01198
JUDGE: Hon. Paul R. Matia
DATE FILED: 12/19/2002
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/01/2000
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/20/2002
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York)
    10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York), NY 10016
    800.217.1522 · info@bernlieb.com
  2. Weisman, Goldberg & Weisman Co., L.P.
    101 Prospect Ave, West; 1600 Midland Building, Weisman, Goldberg & Weisman Co., L.P., OH 44115
    216.781.1111 216.781.6747 ·
No Document Title Filing Date