Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/23/2004 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: April 10, 2002

According to the Company’s FORM 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended April 25, 2004, on April 4, 2003, the court heard arguments on a motion to dismiss and dismissed the amended class action complaint. The plaintiffs filed a second amended class action complaint on May 5, 2003 naming only the individual defendants and not the Company. The individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended class action complaint on June 4, 2003, to which plaintiffs responded. The court heard oral arguments on the matter on October 30, 2003 and in March 2004 the second amended class action complaint was dismissed. No further actions have occurred in regards to this matter since the second amended class action complaint was dismissed and, as such, the Company believes that it will have no liability in regard to this matter.

The original Complaint asserts claims against defendants for violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Complaint alleges that as a result of materially false and misleading statements concerning Roadhouse Grill's products, operations, and financial results, the Company's securities traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period. The complaint alleges that the artificial inflation continued until the Company admitted that it would be forced to restate its prior overstated and inflated financial results.

NOTE: On May 20, 2002, the Court entered the Order granting defendant Roadhouse Grill, Inc.’s suggestion of bankruptcy and granting the motion to stay this action.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Restaurants
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GRLL
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: OTC

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 02-CV-60493
JUDGE: Hon. Donald M. Middlebrooks
DATE FILED: 04/10/2002
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/31/1998
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/01/2001
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York)
    10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York), NY 10016
    800.217.1522 · info@bernlieb.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 02-CV-60493
JUDGE: Hon. Donald M. Middlebrooks
DATE FILED: 05/05/2003
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/31/1998
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/01/2001
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York)
    10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (New York), NY 10016
    800.217.1522 · info@bernlieb.com
No Document Title Filing Date