On or around 10/06/2009 (Date of order of final judgment)
Filing Date: August 03, 2001
According to a Press Release dated August 3, 2001, a securities class action lawsuit was filed charging defendants with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for issuing a Registration Statement and Prospectus (the"Prospectus") that contained materially false and misleading information and failed to disclose material information. The Prospectus was issued in connection with MedicaLogic's initial public offering of 5.9 million shares of common stock at $17.00 per share that was commenced on or about December 13, 1999 (the "IPO"). The complaint alleges that the Prospectus was false and misleading because it failed to disclose (i) the Underwriter Defendants' agreement with certain investors to provide them with significant amounts of MedicaLogic shares in the IPO in exchange for exorbitant and undisclosed commissions; and (ii) the agreement between the Underwriter Defendants and certain of its customers whereby the Underwriter Defendants would allocate shares in the IPO to those customers in exchange for the customers' agreement to purchase MedicaLogic shares in the after-market at pre-determined prices.
NOTE: On January 24, 2002, the Company filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: MedicaLogic, Inc.
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: MDLI
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Blime Feldheim, et al. v. MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc., et al.