Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/31/2000 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: September 16, 1998

According to the Judgment entered on March 31, 2000, for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion on March 28, 2000, the defendants' motions to dismiss is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. Plaintiffs' request for leave to amend the amended complaint is denied. The case is closed.

The complaint alleges that certain officers, directors and controlling shareholders of the Company violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by, among other things, misrepresenting and/or omitting material information concerning PRT's business and operations in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with PRT's initial public offering conducted on or around November 21, 1997.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: PRTG
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 98-CV-06550
JUDGE: Hon. Denny Chin
DATE FILED: 09/16/1998
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/21/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/05/1998
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
    200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville), NY 11747
    631.367.7100 631.367.1173 · info@lerachlaw.com
  2. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY)
    One Pennsylvania Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY), NY 10119-1065
    212.594.5300 ·
  3. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
    600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA), CA 92101
    800.449.4900 · support@milberg.com
  4. Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C.

    800.993.3233 · sfprpc@op.net
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 98-CV-06550
JUDGE: Hon. Denny Chin
DATE FILED: 03/15/1999
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/21/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/05/1998
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY)
    One Pennsylvania Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY), NY 10119-1065
    212.594.5300 ·
  2. Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C.

    800.993.3233 · sfprpc@op.net
No Document Title Filing Date