Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/20/2001 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: April 09, 1999

According to the Final Order entered on September 20, 2001, U.S. District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. The Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint was dismissed and the case closed.

On July 6, 2000, the case was reopened after Judge William P. Dimitrouleas granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Value Holdings' motion to alter and/or amend the Judge’s March 31, 2000 Final Order dismissing the consolidated amended. The plaintiffs soon after filed a Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.

The original Complaint alleges that defendants Stephan and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10-b(5). Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants reported materially false and misleading financial results for the second and third quarters of 1998. Earnings for the second and third quarters of 1998 were overstated because Stephan continued to use historical gross profit percentages even though the product mix of the Company was materially altered as a result of the Company's acquisition of Morris-Flamingo LP, a hair products distributor, in March of 1998.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Personal & Household Products
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: TSC
Company Market: American SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 99-CV-6434
JUDGE: Hon. William P. Dimitrouleas
DATE FILED: 04/09/1999
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/04/1998
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/1999
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
    600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA), CA 92101
    800.449.4900 · support@milberg.com
  2. Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
    6 East 45th Street, Stull, Stull & Brody (New York), NY 10017
    310.209.2468 310.209.2087 · SSBNY@aol.com
  3. Weiss & Yourman (New York, NY)
    The French Building, 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1600, Weiss & Yourman (New York, NY), NY 10126
    212.682.3025 212.682.3010 · info@wyca.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 99-CV-6434
JUDGE: Hon. William P. Dimitrouleas
DATE FILED: 07/26/2000
CLASS PERIOD START: 08/04/1998
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/1999
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (Boca Raton)
    The Plaza, Suite 900, 5355 Town Center Road, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (Boca Raton), FL 33486
    561.361.5000 ·
No Document Title Filing Date