Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 09/11/2000 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: February 13, 1998

According to the docket, on May 18, 2000, a Stipulation of Settlement was filed, and on June 26, 2000, the Court entered the Order by U.S. District Judge Roslyn O. Silver preliminarily granting/approving settlement and providing for notice. The Court later entered the Final Judgment and Order on September 11, 2000. By the Final Judgment and Order, the case was dismissed with prejudice and terminated.

The Notice of Proposed Settlement dated June 26, 2000, announces the establishment of a settlement fund in the amount of $3,456,000.

As reported in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1999, on September 21, 1998, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint, alleging a claim against the Company and the individual defendants under Section 11 of the Securities Act and a claim against the individual defendants under Section 15 of the Securities Act, based upon the conduct alleged in the original complaints. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages. On November 5, 1998, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. On June 3, 1999 Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part by the Court.

On February 13, 1998, a purported securities class action complaint, WEISS
V. GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., No. 98-0268 PHX-ROS, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against the Company and
certain officers and directors alleging that defendants violated Section 11 of
the Securities Act of 1933 (the 'Securities Act') by making false misleading
statements and omissions in GameTech's Form S-1 Registration Statement in
connection with the Company's public offering on November 25, 1997.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Recreational Activities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GMTC
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Arizona
DOCKET #: 98-CV-0268
JUDGE: Hon. Rosyln O. Silver
DATE FILED: 02/13/1998
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/25/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/08/1998
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Miller, Morton, Caillat & Nevis
    50 West San Fernando, Suite 1300 , Miller, Morton, Caillat & Nevis, CA 95113-2413
    408.292.1760 408.292.4480 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: D. Arizona
DOCKET #: 98-CV-0268
JUDGE: Hon. Rosyln O. Silver
DATE FILED: 09/21/1998
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/25/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/08/1998
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (Former New York)
    1285 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (Former New York), NY 10019
    212.554.1400 212.554.1444 · blbg@blbglaw.com
  2. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
    600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA), CA 92101
    800.449.4900 · support@milberg.com
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date