Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 12/02/1998 (Other)

Filing Date: March 10, 1998

According to the Stipulation and Order of dismissal, dated December 12, 1998, from U.S. District Judge Charles L. Brieant of the Southern District of New York, the case was dismissed on the merits, with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs, and with all rights of appeal waived.

According to a Press Release dated 3/13/98, the Complaint charges that the defendants, Equity Trust, its directors and its investment adviser, Gabelli Funds, Inc., violated Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 20 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and related state law, by making material misstatements and omissions in soliciting shareholders' proxies to remove Equity Trust's fundamental restriction on the issuance of senior securities, including preferred stock. More specifically, among other things, the complaint alleges that the defendants (i) falsely suggested that the only risk to Equity Trust's shareholders of the issuance of senior securities was the risk associated with leveraging the fund and (ii) failed to disclose the material effect that the issuance of preferred stock
would have on the ability of shareholders to control major business decisions
of the fund, including the election of directors and any proposal to open-end
the fund. The complaint seeks a judgment (i) rescinding the misinformed
shareholder vote to remove Equity Trust's restriction on the issuance of senior
securities, and (ii) enjoining the issuance of senior securities unless and
until the restriction on such securities has been approved by a fully informed
vote of the shareholders.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Misc. Financial Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: GAB
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 98-CV-1710
JUDGE: Hon. Charles L. Brieant
DATE FILED: 03/10/1998
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/03/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/10/1998
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (Boston)
    75 State Street, Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (Boston), MA 02109
    617.439.3939 617.439.0134 · info@shulaw.com
  2. Wolf Popper, LLP
    845 Third Avenue, Wolf Popper, LLP, NY 10022-6689
    877.370.7703 212.486.2093 · IRRep@wolfpopper.com
No Document Title Filing Date