Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 04/01/1998 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: July 07, 1997

According to the closing Order, entered on April 1, 1998, from U.S. District Judge John S. Martin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the FRCP.

The original complaint alleges that Minorca Resources, Scotia McLeod Inc., and Scotia Capital Markets Inc. violated section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 by making material misrepresentations in connection with the Special Warrants Offering of Minorca completed on March 13, 1997. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and/or omitted material facts, concerning Minorca, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of gold properties. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Minorca blindly relied upon gold resource calculations which were derived from sample testing methods which were not industry-accepted, and that as a result, the gold resource calculations cited by Minorca relating to the Busang Deposit were dramatically overstated. The complaint further alleges that when the company disclosed that the gold resource calculations at the Busang Deposit had been materially overstated, the price of Minorca common stock dropped almost 70 percent.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Basic Materials
Industry: Gold & Silver
Headquarters: Canada

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: MCW.TO
Company Market: Toronto Stock Exchange
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 97-CV-05009
JUDGE: Hon. John S. Martin
DATE FILED: 07/07/1997
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/13/1997
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/07/1997
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Curtis V. Trinko LLP
    16 West 46th Street 7th Floor, Curtis V. Trinko LLP, NY 10036
    212.490.9550 212.986.0158 · ctrinko@trinko.com
No Document Title Filing Date