|  | | 2009 News and Press Releases | | |
HEADLINE NEWS:
The Iqbal Case and Damages Actions under the Federal Securities Laws
Kevin LaCroix
The D & O Diary. October 26, 2009
_________________________________________________________________________
EXCERPT: The Supreme Court’s decision in the Iqbal case earlier this year has generated a great deal of controversy and comment and even a proposal to overturn the decision legislatively. Iqbal does seem to be having an impact on a number of cases. An interesting question, however, is whether the Iqbal case will have an impact on federal securities cases, given that the securities laws already have their own separate heightened pleading standards. But a recent Eighth Circuit decision, applying Iqbal to affirm a lower court dismissal, suggests that Iqbal could indeed have an impact in damages actions under the federal securities laws. First, some background. Fed. R .Civ. P. 8(a)(2) requires that a "claim for relief" must contain a "short plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Historically, courts had come to use the shorthand phrase "notice pleading" to describe the requirements under this rule. In the Supreme Court’s 2008 Twombley case, the Court said that in order to satisfy these pleading requirements, the complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to "state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." In the 2009 Iqbal case, the claimant in a Bivens action had sought to argue that Twombley’s "facial plausibility" test should be limited to the pleadings made in the context of an antitrust dispute, as had been involved in Twombley. The Supreme Court held that that Twombley was limited to antitrust actions "is not supported by Twombley and is incompatible with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Twombley, the Iqbal court said, "expounded the pleading standard for all civil actions." The Iqbal decision that the "facial plausibility" pleading sufficiency test applies to all federal civil actions has been the subject of a great deal of heated discussion. |
|
|
