House Banking Panel Votes to Regulate Derivatives

House Banking Panel Votes to Regulate Derivatives - 10/15/2009

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright © 2001
Stanford Law School

2009 News and Press Releases

SEARCH

News	News 2009
HEADLINES \| SETTLEMENTS AND DISMISSALS \| COURT FILINGS LINKS TO OTHER NEWS \| NEWS ARCHIVE	HEADLINES ARCHIVED SETTLEMENTS AND DISMISSALS ARCHIVED

HEADLINE NEWS:

House Banking Panel Votes to Regulate Derivatives
Staff Writer

The Associated Press. October 15, 2009
_________________________________________________________________________

EXCERPT: A House panel voted Thursday to regulate for the first time privately traded derivatives, the kind of exotic financial instruments blamed for helping bring down Lehman Brothers and nearly toppling American International Group. The 43-26 vote by the House Financial Services Committee, was a major step toward completing President Barack Obama's proposed overhaul of the regulations governing the nation's financial institutions. The mostly party line vote showed that Democrats were prepared to band together to override objections by Republicans and the financial lobby to push for increased protections for investors. The Obama administration hailed the legislation as throwing sunlight on an opaque and growing $600 trillion global market that has so far escaped government oversight. The bill ''is absolutely essential to preserving a strong marketplace, preserving transparency (and) getting incentives right in the system,'' said Michael Barr, Treasury's assistant secretary for financial institutions. ''We don't want to allow any firm like an AIG to be able to engage in derivatives transactions without requiring those transactions be reported and to be traded on an exchange,'' he said. […] Under the proposed bill, which still faces scrutiny by the full House and in the Senate, AIG would have been required to show government regulators that it had sufficient reserves as a back up.

Back to News page | Back to Archived News 2009 page | Back to Top

�